You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 208 words from this article are provided below; about 441 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 93.2 | The History Cooperative
93.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



"There She Is, Miss America": The Politics of Sex, Beauty, and Race in America's Most Famous Pageant. Ed. by Elwood Watson and Darcy Martin. (New York: Palgrave, 2004. x, 205 pp. Cloth, $69.95, ISBN 1-4039-6301-0. Paper, $19.95, ISBN 1-4039-6302-9.)

The editors Elwood Watson and Darcy Martin open this volume by asserting that "the Miss America pageant provides invaluable insight into broader changes and trends in American culture" in the twentieth century (p. 2). With a laudable breadth of vision, they gathered nine historical, literary, ethnographic, and folkloric analyses of the gender and racial politics of beauty competitions to support their argument. 1
      In the first section, which focuses on historical analysis, Kimberly A. Hamlin's essay casts the earliest Miss America contests as both a conservative response to the pageantry of the woman suffrage movement and a controversial commercial display of scantily clad young women. Next, Mary Anne Schofield asks whether Miss America or Rosie the Riveter better represented women's experiences during World War II. In the third chapter, Sarah Banet-Weiser portrays the crowning of the Jewish Bess Meyerson in 1945 and the deaf Heather Whitestone in 1995 as exceptions proving the rule that Miss America represents the normative "whiteness" of the national self. . . .

There are about 441 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.