| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.4

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 226 words from this article are provided below; about 430 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.4 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Righteous Propagation: African Americans and the Politics of Racial Destiny after Reconstruction. By Michele Mitchell. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004. xxii, 388 pp. Cloth, $59.95, ISBN 0-8078-2902-1. Paper, $22.50, ISBN 0-8078-5567-7.)
Reading Righteous Propagation one is continually taken aback by the unexamined tensions Michele Mitchell uncovers in postemancipation black reform: "civilizing" missions to Africa coexisted with anti-imperialist sentiments; eugenic solutions were a central part of racial uplift; fears of miscegenation pervaded racial discourse. Breathing new life into a familiar narrative, Mitchell's "social history of ideas" offers more breadth and depth than intellectual histories of "race leaders," and she avoids dry descriptions of institution building by placing ideologies of sexuality and gender at the center of her analysis.	1
Mitchell opens her book with a lively description of "Liberia fever" in the late nineteenth century. African American proponents of emigration suggested that colonization would improve fecundity, masculine prowess, and the protection of vulnerable African American women. But most did not interrogate the consequences of imperialism for Africans, instead viewing colonization as an opportunity to "fortify black manhood" (p. 56). By the early twentieth century, however, anti-imperialist discourse strengthened with the development of Pan-Africanism. Nevertheless, notes Mitchell, Pan-Africanism was premised on racialized theories of conquest, even if the conquerors were African Americans. It was, in short, the black man's burden.	. . .

There are about 430 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.