You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 192 words from this article are provided below; about 441 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.4 | The History Cooperative
92.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2006
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The Constitution in Wartime: Beyond Alarmism and Complacency. Ed. by Mark Tushnet. (Durham: Duke University Press, 2005. 261 pp. Cloth, $79.95, ISBN 0-8223-3456-9. Paper, $22.95, ISBN 0-8223-3468-2.)

In his introduction to this collection of essays, Mark Tushnet presents them as an alternative to the two dominant views of post-9/11 actions by the Bush administration: (a) "alarmists who see ... gross restrictions on" American civil liberties, and (b) "administration shills who see in such actions entirely reasonable ... accommodations ... to the new realities of national security" (p. 1). Arguing that neither of these positions contributes much to public understanding of the real constitutional issues raised since September 2001, he describes the essays as "reflections on what might be called [a] second generation of more temperate responses" to the Bush war on terrorism (pp. 1, 2). For the most part stimulating, and at the same time disquieting, they offer a number of intriguing insights that should lead one to be cautious in drawing generalizations about American constitutionalism in a time of armed conflict. Space permits only a brief discussion of several essays that captured the attention of this reviewer. . . .

There are about 441 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.