You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 200 words from this article are provided below; about 408 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.3 | The History Cooperative
92.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



From Tavern to Courthouse: Architecture & Ritual in American Law, 1658–1860. By Martha J. McNamara. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004. xviii, 162 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-8018-7395-9.)

Martha J. McNamara presents two related theses—architectural and professional—in the short space of 110 text pages and leaves this reader yearning for more. As the title suggests, she traces the development of courthouse architecture through much of the colonial and early national periods. The title, however, does not specify that McNamara has limited the subject of the book to Massachusetts nor, indeed, that her analysis is further limited to nine courthouses in four counties (Suffolk, Essex, Worcester, and Hampshire). According to her thesis, county court sessions in colonial Massachusetts were held in undifferentiated space in townhouses (seats of local government that provided merchant exchanges in an open first floor and town and county government space in the building above). But by 1830 county court and administrative functions were housed in "a bounded judicial space" of multiroom courthouse with adjacent prison complex, remote from the mercantile district. "These judicial landscapes provided Massachusetts lawyers with a stage upon which they could both define and represent themselves as a profession" (p. 57). . . .

There are about 408 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.