You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 127 words from this article are provided below; about 390 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.3 | The History Cooperative
92.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Past Imperfect: Facts, Fictions, Fraud—American History from Bancroft and Parkman to Ambrose, Bellesiles, Ellis, and Goodwin. By Peter Charles Hoffer. (New York: PublicAffairs, 2004. xvi, 287 pp. $26.00, ISBN 1-58648-244-0.)

In Past Imperfect, "a book about history for nonhistorians" (p. x), Peter Charles Hoffer seeks to locate the recent, well-publicized depredations of several famous historians in a larger historical and intellectual context. In so doing, Hoffer strives to illuminate the forces that led admired historians to glaring ethical and scholarly lapses and to "explain to people who love to read history how the history profession has fallen into disarray and controversy" (ibid.). Whatever one makes of the latter judgment, Hoffer's desire to historicize recent debates about the discipline is commendable. . . .

There are about 390 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.