You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 215 words from this article are provided below; about 380 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.3 | The History Cooperative
92.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Red Spies in America: Stolen Secrets and the Dawn of the Cold War. By Katherine A. S. Sibley. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2004. xiv, 370 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-7006-1351-X.)

Katherine A. S. Sibley's book is an account of Soviet espionage in America and of U.S. responses to it. She thinks that President Franklin D. Roosevelt showed "naïveté about the scope of Soviet intentions" (p. 8). Against the background of sensational German spy cases at the start of World War II, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) proceeded relatively "quietly" with its investigation of espionage conducted under cover of the Soviets' Amtorg trading corporation (p. 60). She refers to the FBI's "scattershot" approach to Moscow's atomic espionage in 1942 (p. 139). 1
      These are merely qualifications to Sibley's main argument, however. She insists that the FBI did perceive the developing threat of Soviet espionage. The bureau began to take appropriate action and showed itself to be on a learning curve that would yield fruit in the Cold War. Setting aside the macro-debate about the early origins of Russo-American rivalry, her book is a contribution to the micro-debate about when, precisely, American suspicions of the Soviet Union took root in World War II. Her answer is, earlier than one might think. . . .

There are about 380 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.