You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 147 words from this article are provided below; about 422 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.2 | The History Cooperative
92.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Public and Private in American History: State, Family, Subjectivity in the Twentieth Century. Ed. by R. Baritono, D. Frezza, A. Lorini, M. Vaudagna, and E. Vezzosi. (Turin: Otto, 2003. 638 pp. Paper, €35.00, ISBN 88-87503-71-0.)

The presidential campaigns of 2000 and 2004 were dominated by the question: "Who are these men?" Notwithstanding their long records of public service, Al Gore, George W. Bush and John Kerry seemed permanently engaged in refining their particular answers, offering voters new and better insights into candidates' personalities. Spouses and children were prominently displayed, moments of devotion and prayer recorded by cameras, hobbies and pets presented as evidence that the candidates were close to the common man. Better: that they were the common man, but with uncommon courage and determination. Who was the most convincing performer (south of the Mason–Dixon line, at least) is a matter of record. . . .

There are about 422 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.