You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 243 words from this article are provided below; about 439 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.2 | The History Cooperative
92.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



JFK, LBJ, and the Democratic Party. By Sean J. Savage. (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2004. x, 429 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-79146169-6.)

The appearance of another study of the presidencies of John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson raises the question whether anything new can be said about those administrations. Sean J. Savage's thoroughly researched work, however, offers a new perspective—an assessment of the two men as party leaders. 1
      Savage attempts to fill a gap in the scholarship by analyzing the relationship of JFK and LBJ to the political cultures of their respective home states and their subsequent performances as leaders of the national Democratic party. The author finds a remarkable similarity between the two in this respect. Neither wanted to be associated with a particular ideological viewpoint or a state party faction. During the 1950s they were ambitious senators whose political behavior reflected "that decade's emphasis on the apparent 'end of ideology' and bipartisan, centrist pragmatism" (p. 329). 2
      Departing from the traditional interpretation, Savage argues that the effort to build "a suprapartisan, centrist policy consensus" (p. 331) began with President Kennedy, rather than his successor. JFK and his advisers did not want to jeopardize party unity by proposing legislation beyond the New Deal–Fair Deal tradition, such as a civil rights bill. The improved Soviet-American relationship after the Cuban missile crisis also offered an opportunity to develop a consensus foreign policy. . . .

There are about 439 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.