You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 260 words from this article are provided below; about 337 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.1 | The History Cooperative
92.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Unions, Radicals, and Democratic Presidents: Seeking Social Change in the Twentieth Century. By Martin Halpern. (Westport: Prae-ger, 2003. xxii, 261 pp. $79.95, ISBN 0-313-32471-9.)

Historians never tire of inquiring, Why no socialism in the United States? and Martin Halpern demonstrates why: asking opens endless and fascinating historical paths. For others like Halpern who moved from the New Left into the academy, the approach also is consistent with a desire to further activism through scholarship. Together this collection of articles, many previously published, argues that progressive social change in America advances when there exists a Democratic president, a strong labor movement, a strong left movement, and many left-center coalitions built around what are commonly considered rights issues. so readers expecting internal coherence may be disappointed; those appreciating a searching intellect, clear exposition, and mastery of the history of postwar labor and politics will not be. The first essay posits that, becausela -bor is the only social movement that directly challenges the central organizing force of corporate capitalism, the labor movement will always be more than an interest group. The next three chapters are mixed: one suggests ways in which left values can be preserved and communicated over the generations, another recounts a 1938 meeting between Henry Ford and Franklin D. Roosevelt to expose the political and economic tensions inherent during the New Deal's perilous infancy, and the third studies the persecution that followed Detroit's 1952 House Committee on Un-American Activities hearings to show that, even as institutions crumbled, African American leftists drew sustenance from the black community. . . .

There are about 337 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.