You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 171 words from this article are provided below; about 397 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Immigrants, Progressives, and Exclusion Politics: The Dillingham Commission, 1900–1927. By Robert F. Zeidel. (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2004. x, 198 pp. $42.00, ISBN 0-87580-323-7.)

Robert F. Zeidel's monograph usefully surveys the story of the Dillingham Commission and sets it in the broader context of the Progressive movement and the evolution of American immigration policy. Zeidel argues that the commission is best understood via a "rationalist" examination of economic considerations, rather than a "romantic" focus on cultural imperatives such as nativism (p. 5). 1
      Zeidel capably details the diverse motives of President Theodore Roosevelt, members of Congress, and lobby organizations in establishing the commission in 1907. He demonstrates as well that commissioners in favor of restriction and those opposed generally shed overt biases in gathering evidence about immigrants and making policy recommendations. And he shows how the commission reflected the broad ideals and practices associated with Progressivism—social science methodologies, ideals of objectivity, and economic analysis of social problems. But the book has a number of weaknesses. . . .

There are about 397 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.