You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 149 words from this article are provided below; about 382 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Under the Wire: How the Telegraph Changed Diplomacy. By David Paull Nickles. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003. 265 pp. $30.95, isbn 0-674-01035-3.)

In recent years, useful books have explored the political as well as the engineering importance of the telegraph and, especially, the transatlantic cable of the late 1860s. David Paull Nickles, a historian at the U.S. Department of State, has written a significant and interestingly researched analysis of how the telegraph and various cable systems did—or did not—change the nature of American and European diplomacy and the personal activities of those regions’ diplomats during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

1
    He believes the diplomats’ use of the new technology helped lead to
the increased bureaucratization and centralization of foreign ministries, the rising importance of signals intelligence, the declining autonomy of diplomatic envoys and, perhaps most important, the accelerated speed of international crises. (p. 191)
. . .

There are about 382 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.