You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 168 words from this article are provided below; about 387 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Language and Political Meaning in Revolutionary America. By John Howe. (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2004. xiv, 281 pp. $39.95, ISBN 1-55849-422-7.)

John Howe argues that contests over language were key to the transformation of American politics in the revolutionary era. "Disagreements over the essential character of political language" divided imperialists from colonists before 1776, and language controversies thereafter proved "fundamental to the emergence of a democratic (albeit white male) politics" (p. 5). Ratification of the federal Constitution—the climax of Howe's story—ushered in "a new political language ... eminently suited to the rhetorical needs of America's expanding empire in the years immediately ahead" (pp. 6, 225). Though the broad outlines of this story are by now familiar to students of print culture and literary history, Howe's synthesis is lucid and illuminating. His most original work focuses on the problems and practice of authorship at a time when politics pivoted on texts and their interpretation and when vulgar "scribblers" challenged the literate elite's discursive monopoly. . . .

There are about 387 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.