You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 515 words from this article are provided below; about 968 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Movie Review | The Journal of American History, 91.3 | The History Cooperative
91.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Movie Reviews



Cold Mountain. Dir. by Anthony Minghella. Miramax Films, 2003. 152 mins.

Cold Mountain is part of a film genre of intimate historical epics—Dr. Zhivago (1965), Reds (1981), The English Patient (1996), Pearl Harbor (2001)—in which war serves as the catalyst for doomed romance. It is often war that brings lovers together and then pulls them apart—sometimes temporarily, sometimes for good. As Humphrey Bogart's Rick Blaine states in Casablanca (1942), a somewhat-less-than-epic variation of this Hollywood type, "the problems of three little people don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world." But of course, it is just that—the problems of these "little people"—that draw us in as viewers and allow us to relate to a particular "crazy world," the chaos and trauma of war, on such a personal and tangible level. 1
      Curiously, the Civil War has only rarely provided the setting for such film spectacles, although Gone with the Wind (1939) is, of course, the granddaddy of them all. But other than that and Shenandoah, a 1965 drama starring Jimmy Stewart as a Virginia farmer determined to keep his family out of the conflict, no major Hollywood film has dealt as fully with Southerners and their home front plight as does Cold Mountain. Anthony Minghella's elaborate production does so through its dramatization of lovers' separation and their desperation to reunite in a narrative so emotionally compelling as to assure its success both in the late 1990s on best-seller lists and earlier this year at the box office. 2
      Charles Frazier based his 1997 novel on the experience of his own great-great-uncle, the Confederate enlistee W. P. Inman, who in late 1864 escaped from an Illinois prison camp and made the trek home—on foot!—to his North Carolina home near Cold Mountain, a high but fairly nondescript peak some twenty miles southwest of Asheville, where the Blue Ridge Mountains merge with the Great Smokies. He was within three miles of home when he met his death in a skirmish at the hands of a particularly notorious home guard unit that had plagued local residents for much of the war. 3
      From those bare facts, Frazier set his fictional Inman on a harrowing odyssey across North Carolina, heading home from a hospital in Raleigh where he was recovering from wounds suffered at Petersburg, Virginia. During his trek in the fall of 1864, he encounters beleaguered widows, bushwhackers, Union renegades, fellow deserters, and the seemingly omnipresent home guardsmen, who collectively suggest the disorder, desperation, and corruption that characterized Southerners' struggle to survive in the ever more lawless and dysfunctional society that had developed in nearly four years of war. Minghella's film is unusually faithful to the book in re-creating these encounters, and one of its great strengths is that they are presented in such graphic, unflinching form, more often than not with violent resolutions that genuinely shock. Rarely has the collective plight of a people at war been conveyed to movie audiences as effectively as it is in this series of disturbing and emotionally charged episodes. . . .

There are about 968 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.