You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 250 words from this article are provided below; about 416 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.3 | The History Cooperative
91.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War. By William Saletan. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. 327 pp. $29.95, ISBN 0-520-08688-0.)

Abortion has dominated electoral campaigns in the United States for thirty years, swept politicians into and out of office, reshaped political parties, and influenced politics at every level. The political power of abortion and the divisions within the citizenry over its legal status, practice, and meaning make abortion one of the historically significant struggles in American history along with suffrage, slavery, and segregation. William Saletan, political commentator for the online magazine Slate, offers a blow-by-blow account of the internal strategies pursued by national pro-choice organization leaders from the mid-1980s into the first years of the twenty-first century. To beat antiabortion referenda and legislation, pro-choice organizations used conservative rhetorics on behalf of women's reproductive rights. The apparent preservation of Roe v. Wade (1973) was won, Saletan contends, by appealing to swing voters' hostility to government, welfare, and taxes. In the process, the organizations for women's rights have been coopted by conservatism; indeed, President George W. Bush and the pro-life movement gained from this confluence of rhetoric and have successfully used the language of choice, privacy, and family to undermine reproductive rights and advance conservatism. For scholars interested in understanding better how electoral campaigns, pollsters, and strategists work at the turn of the twenty-first century and for those interested in the politics of gender, abortion, and sexuality, this is an important, insightful (and disturbing) book. . . .

There are about 416 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.