You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 193 words from this article are provided below; about 401 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.2 | The History Cooperative
91.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Free Hearts and Free Homes: Gender and American Antislavery Politics. By Michael D. Pier-son. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003. xvi, 250 pp. Cloth, $49.95, ISBN 0-8078-2782-7. Paper, $19.95, ISBN 0-8078-5455-7.)

Michael D. Pierson points out that those studying gender and antislavery often focus on "radicals," neglecting a more "broad coalition of antislavery reformers," while those examining antislavery politics concentrate on parties' "legislative and economic" agendas (p. 4). Yet, Pierson argues, antebellum political parties also appealed to voters' beliefs about gender. Free Hearts and Free Homes analyzes how the Liberty party, the Free Soil party, the Democratic party, and the Republican party marshaled "gender ideologies to demarcate themselves from their electoral rivals" (p. 4). 1
      Drawing on eighty antebellum newspapers, Pierson combines impressive archival research with an inclusive approach to gender studies. His desire to remedy scholars' neglect of gendered aspects of political party ideology leads him to incorporate sources from party newspapers and publications that have previously been overlooked. Pierson is also part of a growing group of scholars who have begun to expand the ways we study gender, considering masculinity as well as femininity. . . .

There are about 401 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.