You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 193 words from this article are provided below; about 376 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.2 | The History Cooperative
91.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Eisenhower, Macmillan, and Allied Unity, 1957–1961. By E. Bruce Geelhoed and Anthony O. Edmonds. (New York: Palgrave, 2003. xxxii, 196 pp. $65.00, ISBN 0-333-64227-9.)

The authors, on the faculty at Ball State University, assert that this is an old-fashioned book harking back to "the old days of diplomatic history" (p. vi). They say further that, if they have a theme, it is that friendships do matter in international relations, and in particular in Anglo-American relations. In examining the significance of the friendship of the British prime minister and the American president from 1957 to 1961, they concentrate, even in their sources, on the interaction between the two individuals and largely exclude defense, Foreign Office, and State Department papers from their consideration. Their focus is on western Europe, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) alliance, and the Middle East and the significance of these issues for the Cold War, and they make the case that Anglo-American relations at this time "functioned almost as an alliance within an alliance, where each country attempted to coordinate its foreign and defense policies within the broader framework of NATO strategy" (p. xi). . . .

There are about 376 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.