You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 155 words from this article are provided below; about 393 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.1 | The History Cooperative
91.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



A Penny for the Governor, a Dollar for Uncle Sam: Income Taxation in Washington. By Phil Roberts. (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2002. xii, 198 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-295-98251-9.)

Phil Roberts, in this well-researched and well-argued book, traces the failed effort to establish an income tax in the state of Washington. The narrative details how Washington's farmers championed a state income tax to address significant economic problems but failed in the face of business interests, which controlled the courts. 1
      In the early chapters of his book, Roberts explores the state's experience with federal income taxation. Previous histories of state income taxation have neglected this crucial context, but Roberts uses it to demonstrate how the Civil War income taxes, the short-lived income tax enacted in 1894, and debates over the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment led residents of Washington to expect that income taxation would reach only the wealthiest citizens. . . .

There are about 393 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.