You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 218 words from this article are provided below; about 421 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.3 | The History Cooperative
90.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2003
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



The General Textile Strike of 1934: From Maine to Alabama. By John A. Salmond. (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2002. xii, 295 pp. $37.50, ISBN 0-8262-1395-2.)

The general textile strike of 1934 has received considerable attention in recent years. Such acclaimed works as Like a Family (1987), by Jacquelyn Dowd Hall et al., and George Stoney and Judith Helfand's film The Uprising of '34 (1995) have helped resurrect, in both scholarly and popular circles, this important event in American labor history. 1
      These recent treatments of the strike have overwhelmingly focused on how the strike played out in the South. It was militant southern workers, after all, whose anger over National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) code violations precipitated the strike. It was in the supposedly anti-union South where many of the strike's most dramatic encounters and confrontations took place. And the strike's legacy continued to be felt in the region for generations. Yet, for all of the South's centrality, the strike was by no means a regional conflict alone, as John A. Salmond demonstrates. Salmond shows that the strike was truly a national affair, extending into hundreds of communities "from Maine to Alabama." His richly textured portrait of those diverse communities enables one to see the dispute in a new light. . . .

There are about 421 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.