You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 126 words from this article are provided below; about 380 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. By Daniel J. Tichenor. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002. xiv, 378 pp. Cloth, $65.00, ISBN 0-691-08804-7. Paper, $22.95, ISBN 0-691-08805-5.)
Despite the scholarly attention paid to immigration to the United States, there has been little attempt to make sense of the significant shifts in American immigration policy historically. Daniel J. Tichenor's excellent book, Dividing Lines, draws on extensive research to tackle a set of central puzzles: Why did U.S. immigration policy toward European immigration remain laissez-faire throughout much of the nineteenth century, even though significant opposition to immigration was apparent almost immediately? What explains the success of restrictionists by the early twentieth century? And how did policy tilt toward expansionism by 1965? . . .

There are about 380 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.