You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 227 words from this article are provided below; about 361 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Previews | The Journal of American History, 90.1 | The History Cooperative
90.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Previews


Americans have feared corruption since the birth of the Republic, but all corruption is not the same. It has a history, and the history of modern corporate corruption, back in the news because of scandals at Enron and other corporations, begins in the Gilded Age. The ability to manipulate and corrupt public information in order to ensure private profit was a marker of the first modern American corporations, the transcontinental railroads. Such corruption, Richard White argues, was central to their operation. It made their promoters wealthy, it defrauded investors and wasted capital, and it helped bankrupt railroads and foster unsustainable development. Corruption was not just a sideshow or a political issue in the Gilded Age. It was critical to how the developing economy worked.

In 1715 virtually every Indian nation in the North American Southeast attacked the British colony of South Carolina. The Yamasee War, as the event has come to be known, nearly destroyed the colony and profoundly changed the entire region. William L. Ramsey explores the factors that brought so many Indian nations together and takes issue with traditional explanations that emphasize trader misconduct as a cause of war. Instead, Ramsey argues that what strained Carolina's economic and diplomatic relations with many southeastern Indian trade partners and allies was the colony's deepening involvement in the broader Atlantic economy.

By conducting a counterfactual exercise, . . .


There are about 361 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.