You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 169 words from this article are provided below; about 468 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.1 | The History Cooperative
90.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


The House and Senate in the 1790s: Petitioning, Lobbying, and Institutional Development. Ed. by Kenneth R. Bowling and Donald R. Kennon. (Athens: Ohio University Press, 2002. xii, 348 pp. $44.95, ISBN 0-8214-1419-4.)
This collection contains ten fairly disconnected articles revolving around the general topic announced in the book's title. Six of the essays remain comfortably within the bounds of what we might call traditional political history, that is, a history focused on elections, debates among the founders, or the actions of legislators. With a few exceptions those mostly descriptive essays will probably be of interest only to specialists in the history of formal politics in the early republic. Essays by Jeffrey L. Pasley, Christine A. Desan, Marion Nelson Winship, and the team of Richard R. John and Christopher J. Young, however, make far grander interpretive claims and strive to expand the boundaries of political history. In those four essays readers will find some new and provocative paths through the well-trod ground of 1790s political history. . . .

There are about 468 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.