You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 247 words from this article are provided below; about 363 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.1 | The History Cooperative
90.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


The Invisible Empire: The Ku Klux Klan in Florida. By Michael Newton. (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2001. xvi, 260 pp. $24.95, ISBN 0-8130-2120-0.)
Few books on the Ku Klux Klan have chronicled its activities in a single state from Reconstruction to the present. Michael Newton—a journalist from Indiana who has published 168 books, most of which are novels (p. 136) and popular historical reference works—has undertaken that task in Florida where the Klan has had a continuous, yet at times weak, existence for the past 135 years. Using secondary sources as a major part of the story, Newton portrays a Klan bent on the use of violent and illegal means to resist efforts of the black population to advance. The story also depicts the ignoring of Klan atrocities by judicial and political officials who often belonged to the Klan themselves. Gradually, however, the Klan devolved from a mainstream organization supported and protected by the "best" elements to a fringe group of multiple Klans with few members and widely condemned. 1
     Newton highlights the traditional patterns of coverage—the Klans of Reconstruction, the roaring twenties, the Great Depression and war, the civil rights era, and the 1990s. Each Klan was a distinct entity arising in response to elements peculiar to the times. Although the Klans did share a consistent intent to stifle black progress, Klan members also expressed resentments in different eras toward immigrants, violators of vice laws, Catholics, Jews, Communists, and labor unions. . . .

There are about 363 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.