You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 191 words from this article are provided below; about 345 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3 | The History Cooperative
89.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


A Lynching in the Heartland: Race and Memory in America. By James H. Madison. (New York: Palgrave, 2001. xiv, 204 pp. $24.95, ISBN 0-312-23902-5.)

James H. Madison, in this useful work, employs perhaps our most infamous lynching photograph to discuss the killing's place in history and memory. Madison generally makes good by using the 1930 lynching as a point of departure for a discussion of lynching, violence, and even redemption in Marion, Indiana, and America. The author's style is sparse, almost Spartan in its simplicity. While readers may occasionally wish for literary adornment and deeper analysis, the style moves things along nicely. 1
     Readers will find no homage to Barbara J. Fields here. There is no evidence that Madison puts any stock in her deconstructionist denial of the validity of race as a category of meaningful analysis. For Madison, the book is all about race. Likewise, scholars will find no allegiance to a view of history that apologizes away plain-white agency or that blames their failings on elite manipulation: "ordinary people have choices, they can decide to work toward equality and justice or toward hatred and even violence." . . .


There are about 345 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.