You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 185 words from this article are provided below; about 378 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3 | The History Cooperative
89.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Race, Color, and Partial Blindness: Affirmative Action under the Law. By Ole O. Moen. (Oslo: Solum Forlag, 2001. 302 pp. Paper, ISBN 82-560-1323-0.)

Ole O. Moen is a Scandinavian scholar who has spent time as a visitor at several American universities. His professed goal is to "'tell the story of affirmative action' in a more balanced manner." His account should please conservatives with its substance and liberals with its rhetoric. 1
     Like many conservative writers, Moen notes Sen. Hubert H. Humphrey's assurances that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was "'color-blind' and would not require preferential treatment of any particular group." Moen further concedes that "there is no direct proof anywhere that Lyndon B. Johnson meant 'affirmative action' to be the color-conscious regulatory tool that it was later to become." He notes that President Johnson's executive orders required only an aggressive search for qualified minority applicants who, once found, would go into a pool of qualified candidates, with the final selection made on a color-blind basis. Moen knows that the original concept required employers, in the words of Executive Order 11246,

2
. . .


There are about 378 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.