You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 172 words from this article are provided below; about 395 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.2 | The History Cooperative
89.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review


Culture of Misfortune: An Interpretive History of Textile Unionism in the United States. By Clete Daniel. (Ithaca: ILR, 2001. xii, 327 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-8014-3853-5.)

The problem child of the labor movement, textile unionism in the United States has been plagued by a history of failures. Workers have faced a chronically volatile industry located in two distinct regions, one of which—the South—had a reputation for "virulent" anti-unionism. To add to the difficulties, the cultures of northern and southern textile workers have been so different that it has been difficult for the latter to unite. While there is no dearth of attempts to explain textile unionism's fortunes in either region, few have examined the fortunes of textile unionism from a national perspective. Clete Daniel's institutional history does this, and this alone makes the book a noteworthy achievement. His research contributes to an important historiographic objective: a comprehensive assessment of the relative importance of industry structure, worker culture, political climate, and institutional leadership in determining textile unionism's success or failure. . . .


There are about 395 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.