You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 241 words from this article are provided below; about 359 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.2 | The History Cooperative
89.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review


Teach Me Dreams: The Search for Self in the Revolutionary Era. By Mechal Sobel. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000. xvi, 368 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-691-04949-1.)

Mechal Sobel has produced the first historical monograph on popular conceptions of selfhood in revolutionary America. The monograph follows upon a pioneering essay collection that Sobel coedited with Ronald Hoffman and Fredrika J. Teute, Through a Glass Darkly: Reflections on Personal Identity in Early America (1997), and it offers a direct counterpoint to a book Sobel opts not to cite, Daniel Walker Howe's Making the American Self: Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (1997). Sobel and Howe are similar insofar as they both cover the long American Revolution spanning the mid-eighteenth to the mid-nineteenth century, but there the similarity ends. Defiantly traditionalist, Howe brought his intellectual history of selfhood to the verge of a supposed democratization of the ideal of self-fashioning beyond canonical white men, so that it might come to embrace at least women and blacks with intellectual credentials. 1
     Sobel corrects the teleological bent of this narrative by broadening the notion of "selfhood" beyond the confines of liberal individualism. Selfhood in Sobel's view is only secondarily an ideology of individual autonomy, and primarily a mechanism for "alterity"—for constructing oppositional identities. Consequently, selfhood is not an ideological possession restricted to privileged white men, but a cultural process fundamental to the identity work performed by all people, whether female or male, black or white. . . .


There are about 359 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.