You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 215 words from this article are provided below; about 406 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.2 | The History Cooperative
89.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review


Die ambivalente Normalisierung: Deutschlanddiskurs und Deutschlandbilder in den USA, 1941–1955 (The ambivalent normalization: Discourse on Germany and images of Germany in the USA, 1941–1955). By Thomas Reuther. (Stuttgart: Steiner, 2000. 476 pp. DM 88, ISBN 3-515-07689-1.) In German.

The relationship between intellectual concepts, public opinion, publicity, and policy has long troubled scholars of international relations. Too often complex ideas seem to be absorbed along with morning coffee and the New York Times. 1
     The German scholar Thomas Reuther uses the discourse theories of Jürgen Habermas to bridge the gap between American images and policies toward Germany. The policies, he argues, followed logically from images derived from a combination of American political and social values with perceptions of those same values in Germans. The result was never a unified view of Germany, before, during, or after the Nazi regime. 2
     Reuther goes far beyond the traditional stereotypes of "good German" versus "bad Nazi" to show how those images evolved from broader intellectual traditions in America. These perceptions influenced not only internal foreign policy decisions but also portrayals in film and literature. The public depictions of these images, then, did not directly influence the policy makers but rather came from the same intellectual streams that formed the views of those politicians and opinion makers. . . .


There are about 406 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.