You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 222 words from this article are provided below; about 377 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.1 | The History Cooperative
89.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


The American Planning Tradition: Culture and Policy. Ed. by Robert Fishman. (Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2000. ix, 328 pp. Cloth, $59.95, ISBN 0-943875-95-1. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 0-943875-96-X.)

At its best, urban history incorporates a wide range of historical subdisciplines, mining diverse strata of intellectual and social history, the politics of conservative financiers and progressive reformers, the visions of engineers and novelists, the experiences of immigrants and the elite, and the effects of ideas and institutions. Likewise the scale is broadly encompassing, extending from that of a city block to a larger regional ecology and the national political arena. The term "metropolitan" captures this interplay, connoting at once an expansive environmental region, politically interconnected districts, and a socially diverse, culturally cosmopolitan population. Such metropolitanism long flourished in the United States, especially between 1890–1930, after which a "corporate regionalism" seriously undercut cooperation in all those domains. 1
     The American Planning Tradition explores various aspects of this rich legacy, especially the long-standing tensions between regionalism and modern cities. Robert Fishman, one of the country's most insightful urban historians, edited the volume and produced two excellent synthetic essays. Other contributors include political historians, urban planners, sociologists, geographers, and landscape architects, an admixture that further demonstrates the potential for both fruitful intellectual exchange and policy alternatives offered by a broadly metropolitan focus. . . .


There are about 377 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.