You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 229 words from this article are provided below; about 306 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.4 | The History Cooperative
88.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Political Culture and Secession in Mississippi: Masculinity, Honor, and the Antiparty Tradition, 1830–1860. By Christopher J. Olsen. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. x, 266 pp. $45.00, ISBN 0-19-513147-9.)

Two related features of Mississippi's political culture contributed to the success of the state's secession movement, Christopher J. Olsen argues. A masculine tradition of honor, which reified independence and sensitized citizens and politicians alike to signs of slavish submission, encouraged rhetorically violent reactions to the antisouthern pronouncements of the increasingly Republican North. That culture of honor thrived in Mississippi in part because political parties were relatively weak. Campaigns generally revolved around neighborhood issues and personalities, not statewide concerns, and voters and candidates were rarely bound together within a disciplined partisan framework. The heritage of Jacksonian party competition might have complicated the process of secession in other parts of the South, Olsen argues, but Mississippi's secessionists operated in a political context largely free of institutional restraints. Honor and antiparty sentiments combined to create a volatile climate in the 1850s, as politicians scrambled for votes by defending slavery and championing manly independence against the demeaning insults of the "abolitionist" North. After an initial chapter setting the social and political context of Jacksonian Mississippi, Olsen devotes the rest of his book to a close analysis of the political forces at work in that crucial decade when the Union split apart. . . .


There are about 306 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.