You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 215 words from this article are provided below; about 354 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.4 | The History Cooperative
88.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


The Strangest Dream: Communism, Anticommunism, and the U.S. Peace Movement, 1945–1963. By Robbie Lieberman. (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2000. xx, 244 pp. $34.95, ISBN 0-8156-2481-2.)

Several historians have recounted the reasons for the failure of the challenge of Henry Wallace and his Progressive party to the Truman administration's Cold War orthodoxy during the presidential campaign of 1948. While Robbie Lieberman's book does not offer startling revisions about the Wallace effort, it neatly traces the steadily escalating national fears and intolerance that undermined resistance to the Cold War consensus pervading American life. In particular, Lieberman shows how "communism" and "peace" became virtually synonymous in the public mind and how mainstream liberals and conservatives hounded American Communists for their pro-Soviet line on foreign policy questions. Although Lieberman provides good coverage of a few individual Communists, most of those involved in the peace movement remain shadowy figures. 1
     The heart of the book traces the gradual revival of the peace movement beginning in the mid-1950s. By then, the weakened Communist party was encouraging its members to cooperate with the main peace groups and not try to control them, but peace organizations and individual noncommunist peace workers, tainted because of their former or alleged associations with peace-seeking Communists, had to decide whether to accept their support. . . .


There are about 354 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.