| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 224 words from this article are provided below; about 355 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National Memory. By Barry Schwartz. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. xiv, 367 pp. $27.50, ISBN 0-226-74197-4.)

You might say that if Abraham Lincoln had not existed, historians of memory would have invented him. Fortunately, according to Barry Schwartz, Lincoln did exist, and while generations of Americans have repeatedly remade him in their own image, this is less because Lincoln's reputation is an endlessly pliable social construction than because the essence of the man has made him available for many legitimate uses. In this, the first of two planned volumes, Schwartz traces some of these uses from the assassination to the dedication of the Lincoln Memorial. 1

Schwartz, a sociologist who has written a number of works about the commemoration of historical figures, has an avowedly revisionist agenda. In the theoretically elaborate introduction of the book, he challenges what he calls the dominant "politics of memory school"—typified by John Bodnar's Remaking America (1992)—because of what Schwartz considers an excessive emphasis on the way conservative elites manipulate history as a means of social control. He also calls for a fuller approach toward understanding the dynamics of memory; in contrast to Merrill Peterson's Lincoln in American Memory (1994), which focuses on the "what" of Lincoln's reputation, Schwartz takes a more sociological approach, emphasizing the "how" and "why." . . .

There are about 355 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.