| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 206 words from this article are provided below; about 399 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

War, Technology, and Experience aboard the USS Monitor. By David A. Mindell. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. xii, 187 pp. Cloth, $35.00, ISBN 0-8018-6249-3. Paper, $14.95, ISBN 0-8018-6250-7.)

Professor David A. Mindell has written a rather long-headed study of USS Monitor's place in history, claiming that the shock of Monitor's dramatic deflection of CSS Virginia in history's first ironclad-to-ironclad clash made it immediately obvious that naval warfare would change drastically. Certainly Monitor's very shape, almost all geometric forms, emphasized the point. 1

But Mindell's work is flawed by a major oversight, factual errors, and a striving for profundity. Although Mindell refers several times to the Royal Navy captain Cowper Coles, he does not seem to know that Coles's turrets were far superior to those of John Ericsson, who had designed and built the Monitor. When the Coles turret was married to moderate freeboard, the resulting seagoing war engine, HMS Devastation, would prove the template of all future armored capital ships. Many historians, including this reviewer, have dealt with this point at some length. Yet Mindell writes of "the innovative, yet conservative [?] British solution that the Monitor challenged" and that "the British Admiralty embraced technological change, albeit conservatively," etc. . . .

There are about 399 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.