You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 198 words from this article are provided below; about 501 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.1 | The History Cooperative
88.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2001
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review




A Measure of Perfection: Phrenology and the Fine Arts in America. By Charles Colbert. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997. xviii, 441 pp. Cloth, $55.00, ISBN 0-8078-2370-8. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 0-8078-4673-2.)

Phrenology, its practice, and its adherents in the nineteenth-century United States constitute a woefully underexplored subject in American history and culture. The last full-length study dedicated to this "pseudoscience" in the United States appeared in 1955, in the form of John D. Davies's Phrenology, Fad and Science: A 19th-Century American Crusade, whose title encapsulates the standard treatment of phrenology. Historians of science have most often concentrated on the early "pure" theory—and, by extension, the "pure" intent—of phrenology's European originators (Franz Joseph Gall and his student Johann Gaspar Spurzheim) and proselytizers (particularly George Combe). Those historians chart simultaneously their contributions to science and society and phrenology's ultimate scientific invalidation and subsequent "vulgarization" by "practical phrenologists" such as Orson Squire Fowler and Samuel R. Wells. Debunked science used for commercial gain wins only a scholarly "harrumph!" for Fowler and his family, who together created a national market for phrenology charts, manuals, casts, and books—one that lasted much longer than the term fad would encompass. . . .


There are about 501 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.