You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 202 words from this article are provided below; about 376 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Marli F. Weiner | Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.4 | The History Cooperative
87.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2001
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Freedom's Women: Black Women and Families in Civil War Era Mississippi. By Noralee Frankel. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. xviii, 270 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-253-33495-0.)

In Freedom's Women, Noralee Frankel provides a case study of black women's efforts to preserve their sense of family during the disruptions of war and the first five years of Reconstruction. Frankel argues that African American families became "male-headed" but not patriarchal. She chronicles the differing points of view separating black family members, who understood themselves to have married and created stable if vulnerable families even during slavery, from slaveholders and Union officials, who insisted that those bonds had no legitimacy. 1
     Influenced by assumptions about black women's uncontrolled sexuality and their primary value as laborers for whites, the military simultaneously demanded official marriages even as they separated family members so that men could serve as soldiers while women and children worked in the (northern-controlled) fields. After the war ended, whites continued to interfere with black families in ways centered around the desire to control their labor; African Americans were prevented from withdrawing women's and children's labor from the fields or choosing to have women's primary work responsibilities be caring for their own families. . . .


There are about 376 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.