You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 311 words from this article are provided below; about 490 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Nancy Shoemaker | Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.4 | The History Cooperative
87.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2001
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Seeds of Empire: The American Revolutionary Conquest of the Iroquois. By Max M. Mintz. (New York: New York University Press, 1999. xii, 231 pp. $28.95, ISBN 0-8147-5622-0.)


Conspiracy of Interests: Iroquois Dispossession and the Rise of New York State. By Laurence M. Hauptman. (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1999. xxii, 304 pp. $34.95, ISBN 0-8156-0547-1.)

Although both of these books deal with the effects of Euro-American expansion on the Iroquois nations in New York State, they could not be more different. Max M. Mintz's Seeds of Empire strikes me as exactly the kind of book the American public wants historians to write. A detailed narrative of the American army's scorched-earth campaign through Iroquois territory during the Revolution, the book breathlessly races from one skirmish to another, pausing for occasional character sketches of the main players, from the shape of their eyebrows to their portly paunches to their penchant for drink. This old-fashioned style of writing history probably appeals to a larger constituency than the drier, analytical style cultivated by most academics does. But unfortunately Mintz has gone Victorian all the way and fills his narrative with people he refers to as half-breeds and squaws and with lurid descriptions of scalpings, mutilations of the dead, and captives' intestines being wrapped around trees. While I am not surprised that such a book could be published in our own times, I am puzzled at who published it. I thought New York University Press stood at the cutting edge with their publications on race as a cultural construction, but then why would they publish a book that harks back to the dark ages? If the American public does want a good read on the American Revolution and the Iroquois, I would still recommend Barbara Graymont's The Iroquois in the American Revolution (1972) or Colin G. Calloway's The American Revolution in Indian Country (1995). . . .


There are about 490 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.