You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 183 words from this article are provided below; about 338 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.3 | The History Cooperative
87.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



The Danger of Dreams: German and American Imperialism in Latin America. By Nancy Mitchell. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999. xiv, 312 pp. Cloth, $49.95, ISBN 0-8078-2489-5. Paper, $19.95, ISBN 0-8078-4775-5.)

The German threat in the Western Hemisphere from the late nineteenth century to World War I was a delusion, and the United States succumbed to it most unrealistically, yet with a consistency that raises the question of the diplomatic usefulness of that vagary. Such is Nancy Mitchell's compelling thesis, which purports to be "a case study in threat perception." What she finds intriguing is not so much "the existence of the image" as "its durability"; she takes issue with most scholarly treatments of the problem and challenges "the idea of a German threat" given the lack of archival evidence. Historians of German imperialism in her eyes have so far equated intentions or desires with capabilities. The scope of Mitchell's impeccable research is impressive, notably on the German side; she never balks at reexamining oft-sifted material and takes pains to probe every long-accepted conclusion regarding the German menace. . . .


There are about 338 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.