You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 244 words from this article are provided below; about 382 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.2 | The History Cooperative
87.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



The Age of the Bachelor: Creating an American Subculture. By Howard P. Chudacoff. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. x, 341 pp. $29.95, isbn 0-691-02796-X.)

A new book from Howard P. Chudacoff is always a delight, because few scholars range over so many cultural obsessions, from social mobility and age consciousness to bachelorhood. Sweeping from seventeenth-century America to the millennium, Chudacoff locates the heyday of bachelorhood between 1890 and 1930 and speculates about a contemporary resurgence. He uncovers an overlooked social category and analyzes a paradox of American individualism. The self-reliant bachelor embodied that ideal more than anyone, yet his nonconformity to marriage cast him as a threat to society. 1
     Chudacoff argues that bachelors were (and are) a subculture that sometimes acted as (or was deemed) a counterculture. Bachelors sometimes rebelled openly, both from broader cultures of masculinity and from society at large. By claiming spaces, building institutions, and ultimately creating a distinct life-style, bachelors set themselves apart in more than just marital status. Bachelor subcultures evolved, the author explains, during an era when young men gained more control over their adult careers and could shape and be shaped by city life. Charting the rise of bachelorhood in an impressive statistical chapter, his baseline is the 1890 census, when a record 41.7 percent of males older than fifteen were single. Chudacoff weighs demographic, economic, and cultural explanations for the surge that lasted until the Great Depression and the postwar marriage boom. . . .


There are about 382 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.