You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 270 words from this article are provided below; about 330 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.2 | The History Cooperative
87.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Cherokee Women: Gender and Culture Change, 1700–1835. By Theda Perdue. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1998. xii, 252 pp. $40.00, isbn 0-8032-3716-2.)

In some ways, Theda Perdue's Cherokee Women is a short treatise on the role women played in Cherokee society as white and red folks met each other in the mid-South in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. It is much more than that, however; it is a pioneering volume suggesting that for too long historians—mostly males—have maintained that the thoughts and actions of men are intrinsically more important than the activities of women, and in so believing we have missed a part of history that gives special meaning to the whole. In fact, as one contemplates the three parts of the book—women's world, contact, and civilization—one recalls many things apparent in one's own research that were neglected and should not have been. For example, native men and women lived lives more separate than did most whites or blacks. Since native males had little to do with farming, historians have described the male activities of hunting, fishing, canoeing, negotiating, and warring while relegating female agricultural activities to a footnote. What makes this neglect all the more embarrassing is the fact that we have consistently maintained that North, Central, and South American Indians have given the world as much as 75 percent of the foods we enjoy—from watermelons to coffee, from peas to forty-two different varieties of corn not improved until hybrid varieties in the 1940s—without mentioning that it was the non-warring women who lifted agriculture to a state not seen in other nations and on other continents. . . .


There are about 330 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.