You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 205 words from this article are provided below; about 369 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.1 | The History Cooperative
Volume 87, Number 1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review




Harnessing the Power of Motherhood: The National Florence Crittenton Mission, 1883–1925. By Katherine G. Aiken. (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1998. xxiv, 266 pp. $38.00, isbn 1-57233-017-1.)

In recent years, early-twentieth-century maternalist, progressive reformers have been called grim traditionalists. Their anti-prostitution, pro–maternity home, and other efforts have been labeled punitive and coercive. In this volume, Katherine G. Aiken rehabilitates the rehabilitators. Focusing tightly on the National Florence Crittenton Mission between its founding in 1883 and the death of its longtime leader, Dr. Kate Waller Barrett, in 1925, Aiken shows that this organization was far more humanitarian, practical, feminist—modern—than usually portrayed. 1
     According to Aiken's reading of the rich trove of documents she draws on, Florence Crittenton homes were fundamentally forward-looking. Their staffs were largely paid and professional. Workers were genuinely dedicated to helping women in difficulty, not overworking or punishing them. Facilities were not prisonlike. They were homelike: welcoming, nurturing, and edifying. Under Dr. Barrett, the organization provided an astounding array of health, educational, vocational, and general welfare services to former prostitutes, destitute immigrants, victims of venereal disease, and unwed mothers and their children. Aiken argues that the Crittenton organization was concerned with building self-respect, self-reliance, and dignity—the hallmarks of American motherhood. . . .


There are about 369 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.