You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 169 words from this article are provided below; about 327 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Book Review | The Journal of American History, 86.4 | The History Cooperative
86.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



To Die For: The Paradox of American Patriotism. By Cecilia Elizabeth O'Leary. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. xiv, 365 pp. $29.95, isbn 0-691-01686-0.)

To Die For takes up the subject of how the celebratory paraphernalia of patriotism—the Fourth of July holiday, the national anthem, the Pledge of Allegiance, and the observance of Memorial Day—came into being between the end of the Civil War and the Yanks' triumphant return from World War I. It seems surprising, at first glance, that these were not bedrock features of American national life, almost as eternal as the Great Plains or the stern visages of the Founding Fathers engraved on our money. But they were not. Cecilia Elizabeth O'Leary asserts, on the contrary, that each of these familiar signs of loyalty and devotion to country was a source of vigorous cultural and political conflict, in which the familiar triad of race, class, and gender figured prominently, along with a kind of last-gasp sectionalism rapidly dissipated by the rise of nationwide markets. . . .


There are about 327 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.