|
|
|
The Internationalization of Police: The DEA in Mexico
María Celia Toro
|
Little has been published on how countries react to the presence of foreign police within their borders. Ethan A. Nadelmann has written a major work on the internationalization of United States criminal law enforcement agencies; its focus, however, is on the "behavior and perspectives of U.S. officials" engaged in international law enforcement activities. Still, his work has provided interesting clues for my own research on Mexican policy toward drugs in the context of United States-Mexican relations.1 |
1 |
| This
article will focus on Mexico's experience with the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), and in particular, on how and why that United
States police agency has become a powerful presence in Mexico and
the source of bitter fights between Mexico and the United States
over the last fifteen years. The DEA's influence, I argue, has been
consequential on two fronts: on the Mexican government and its antidrug
policies and on the organization and practice of drug trafficking
in Mexico. Leaving aside the critical issue of how, over the last
fifteen years, the DEA has modified the relationship between the
Mexican government and drug traffickers, in this article I will
concentrate on the influence of the agency on Mexican drug policy
and on the challenge that DEA agents have come to represent for
the Mexican state. |
2 |
| That
challenge is to the most exclusive, that is, sovereign, of a state's
powers, namely, law enforcement. The police is not only in charge
of legally enforcing a country's laws; it is also the instrument
of a central authority. The badge and gun of DEA agents represent
United States sovereign police power, which does not extend beyond
American borders. Many governments have come to accept the occasional
practice of hot pursuit across frontiers to arrest fleeing criminals,
but very few will tolerate the exercise of police power by a foreign
agency. According to Nadelmann, "The presence of foreign police
may be accepted, but virtually never the legal authority that underpins
them in their own country." The impossibility of enforcing one country's
laws in another polity leads to extremely awkward situations for
the DEA in Mexico, which will be described in this article.2 |
3 |
|
The DEA in Other Countries
| |
American antidrug agents have reached outside United States borders with the prime objectives of enforcing their laws more effectively and of reducing the amount of drugs smuggled into the United States. They began traveling abroad and stationed themselves in other countries for the first time early in the twentieth century, whenpractically overnightthe international drug trade became illegal under United States law. The first United States laws penalizing the import of opium and cocaine were enforced by narcotics agents in the Treasury Department, concerned, as a revenue and customs agency, with illegal imports. The United States Customs and Border Patrol were the most important agencies enforcing antidrug laws in the 1910s and 1920s. The international presence of United States antidrug enforcement agents in those days was mostly "local," covering Canada and Mexico. Reaching outside usually meant crossing the border in hot pursuit of fleeing drug dealers, asking the counterpart agency in another nation to locate the criminalfrequently an American citizenand send him back to the United States, or entering neighboring countries on intelligence-gathering missions. At the beginning of this century, few countries experienced drug-related transgressions of their territorial sovereignty as a result of attempts to enforce United States drug laws. |
. . . |
There are about 8652 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|