You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 242 words from this article are provided below; about 396 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 87.2 | The History Cooperative
87.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2000
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review



Gentlemen and Freeholders: Electoral Politics in Colonial Virginia. By John Gilman Kolp. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998. xiv, 249 pp. $46.00, isbn 0-8018-5843-7.)

Long viewed as a model of stability, Virginia's colonial political culture has been variously attributed to entrenched planter oligarchies, a model democracy, and a patron-client world of deferential freeholders and issueless elections. The problem with these structural approaches to political culture is getting it to move. They cannot explain process and change. John Gilman Kolp's functional approach revises this static model for Virginia in two ways. He recognizes two coexisting and interactive but distinct levels of political community—one centered on Williamsburg politics and the other at the level of the electoral district. But Kolp moves beyond the hustings and into local units of political community, those centered on parish, vestry, or even rural neighborhood politics, to uncover the practices that shaped their politics. Along the way he finds a dynamic model for Virginia's political culture. 1
     He uses a labor-intensive method to get there. Tallying frequencies of contested burgess elections, Kolp divides Virginia's counties into categories of competitive, intermittently competitive, and noncompetitive electoral politics. Then, analyzing each voter in Virginia's county poll books (there are several hundred), Kolp uncovers patterns behind the contentiousness. His method of integrating and correlating each voter's decision with relevant local factors as well as relevant electoral issues allows the reader "to understand the workings of Virginia's political culture" (emphasis mine). . . .


There are about 396 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.