|
THIS ISSUE begins with a reflection by Michael Lewis on an experiment
in teaching local environmental history. The essay is instructive
and inspiring. Lewis's essay also struck me as an incredibly powerful
challenge to people who teach environmental history: No matter what
our research interests, he argues, we all can and should make scholarly
connections to the places where we work.
In a second "reflections"essay, Laura
Watt, Leigh Raymond, and Meryl Eschen consider the similarities
and differences in U. S. efforts to save endangered species and
preserve historical places. The two efforts at first seem to be
unrelated. But Watt, Raymond, and Eschen show that species protection
and historical preservation have much in common, and their essay
offers practical suggestions for the future as well as insight
into the past.
The three articles in this issue address three very different
issues. By looking at the ways early modern Europeans learned
about tobacco, Peter Mancall offers new insight into one of the
most fundamental questions in environmental history: How do living
things become commodities? Rauno Lahtinen and Timo Vuorisalo assess
the environmental effects of the two world wars on a Finnish city.
Their work adds to the rapidly growing literature on the environmental
history of war. By exploring the role of gender expectations in
shaping the response of American conservationists to Rachel Carson's
Silent Spring, Maril Hazlett sheds new light on the transition
from conservation to environmentalism.
. . . |