You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Enviromental History online. About 262 words from this article are provided below; about 720 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to Environmental History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Environmental History, you can:
•  get subscription information here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Environmental History (8.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• get subscription information here to receive print and electronic issues.
• 
Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | Environmental History, 8.4 | The History Cooperative
8.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2003
Previous
Next
Environmental History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

Book Review


Am Tag danach. Zur Bewältigung von Naturkatastrophen in der Schweiz 1500–2000. [The Day After: Overcoming Natural Disasters in Switzerland, 1500–2000.] Edited by Christian Pfister. Bern/Stuttgart/ Vienna: Haupt, 2002. 263 pp. Illustrations, notes, maps, graphs, bibliographies, index. Cloth 58.00, paper 36.00 (Euro). Simultaneously published in French as Le jour d'après. Surmonter les catastrophes naturelles: le cas de la Suisse entre 1500 et 2000.

In 1881, when the citizens of Tell City, Indiana, and New Elm, Wisconsin, heard the news of a landslide killing 114 people in Elm, Switzerland, their response was immediate and impressive: They collected money to help the victims and to rebuild Elm. More than one out of every four Swiss francs donated to Elm's survivors came from abroad, and most of this share came from emigrants to North America. The massive monetary solidarity covered exactly 74 percent of the damage, as calculated by local authorities; so one could write a success story of international aid to a grief-stricken community. And yet, as Hans Peter Bläuer points out in his contribution to this volume, the narrative is a bit more complex. The contemporaneous attribution of the catastrophe to the "blind forces of nature" was a rhetorical device to raise funds, since the landslide was a direct result of improperly conducted slate mining in the mountains of Elm. Some mining engineers had warned against the continuation of the exploitative practices, but to no avail. In the press coverage, however, these controversies were glossed over in favor of a unified portrayal of Elm's citizens as helpless victims deserving of support. . . .

There are about 720 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.