You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Enviromental History online. About 204 words from this article are provided below; about 360 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to Environmental History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Environmental History, you can:
•  get subscription information here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Environmental History (8.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• get subscription information here to receive print and electronic issues.
• 
Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | Environmental History, 8.1 | The History Cooperative
8.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
January, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
Environmental History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Fire in Sierra Nevada Forests: A Photographic Interpretation of Ecological Change since 1849. By George E. Gruell. Missoula, Mont.: Mountain Press, 2001. xv + 238 pp. Illustrations, plates, glossary, bibliography, index. Paper $20.00.

In Fire in Sierra Nevada Forests, George E. Gruell uses rephotography to demonstrate how more than a century of fire suppression has led to the deterioration of forests throughout the Sierra Nevada. He presents eighty-four sets of paired photographs, one of each set taken before 1920 (but ranging as far back as 1849), the other taken from the same location during the early 1990s. Gruell mixes photographic evidence of forest composition and density with modern field observations to document drastic transformations in mountain landscapes. Gruell concludes that Sierra Nevada forests have grown more dense and the canopy more complete and less healthy. This increase in density can be misleading. "It is hard to shake the intuitive sense that when it comes to forest, denser is better," Gruell explains. "Our purpose here is to educate our instincts, discovering what is healthier for the ecosystem as a whole" (p.1). Today's forests are more prone to disease, insect infestation, and fires of catastrophic intensity than those photographed by Gruell's predecessors. . . .


There are about 360 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.