You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Enviromental History online. About 211 words from this article are provided below; about 437 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to Environmental History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Environmental History, you can:
•  get subscription information here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Environmental History (8.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• get subscription information here to receive print and electronic issues.
• 
Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | Environmental History, 8.1 | The History Cooperative
8.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
January, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
Environmental History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Forests Under Fire: A Century of Ecosystem Mismanagement in the Southwest. Edited by Christopher J. Huggard and Arthur R. Gómez. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press, 2001. xxxiv + 307 pp. Illustrations, maps, photographs, abbreviations, list of contributors, bibliographies, index. $40.00.

In May 2000, a "controlled burn" proved to be anything but, as a fire set by National Park Service personnel at Bandelier National Monument nearly devastated Los Alamos. By the time 1,100 fire fighters managed to get the blaze under control, 18,000 people had been evacuated, 405 families had lost their homes, and nearly 48,000 acres had been charred. The fire burned over 9,000 acres of the Los Alamos National Laboratories site, coming within a mile of the main nuclear facilities and radioactive waste storage units. 1
     Not surprisingly, a political frenzy resulted, with blame quickly focusing on the National Park Service. Park Service personnel defended themselves by arguing that they had just been trying to correct the unfortunate ecological results of decades of forest change. Fire suppression, combined with grazing, road building, logging, and urbanization, had led to drastic changes in forest structure and function across the southwest. Controlled burns, the Park Service claimed, would restore the health of the forest, reducing the risk of catastrophic fire. . . .


There are about 437 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.