You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Enviromental History online. About 384 words from this article are provided below; about 19956 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to Environmental History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Environmental History, you can:
•  get subscription information here.
• Purchase this article in PDF form for $10.00.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Environmental History (8.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• get subscription information here to receive print and electronic issues.
• 
Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
William Rollins | Reflections on a Spare Tire: SUVs and Postmodern Environmental Consciousness | Environmental History, 11.4 | The History Cooperative
11.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
October, 2006
Previous
Next
Environmental History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 
 

reflections on a spare tire: SUVs AND POSTMODERN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS

WILLIAM ROLLINS


 

ABSTRACT

This article identifies sport utility vehicles (SUVs) with postmodern developments in industrial society, automobile manufacturing and marketing, land use, and the environment. A historical backdrop demonstrates links between vehicular systems and conceptions of nature protection: nineteenth-century rail produced monuments at discrete points, whereas the modernist automobile culture of the 1930s-1950s separated nature and urban civilization and created zones of wilderness. Today's SUV culture echoes a more complicated "de-differentiated" ideal that can be approached through advertising slogans and spare-tire covers. Viewed pessimistically, this postmodernism means "no boundaries" in people's exploitation of the environment; more optimistically it means seamlessly integrated concern–even in vehicles.

"SUZUKI LIKES NATURE." Emblazoned on the spare-tire cover of a Grand Vitara, these words imply that nature is of interest for the owners and manufacturers of four-wheel drives. More generally, they challenge us to reflect on environmental consciousness in an age of sport-utility vehicles (SUVs) (see Figure 1). Millions of people all over the world have flocked to buy SUVs: Until recently they have made up almost half of all new car sales in the United States, and they are popular in virtually every other industrialized Western nation as well.1 The problem is that SUVs are big and heavy—up to three times heavier than an ordinary passenger car—and bigger, gas-guzzling engines are needed to move them. Many of the larger models are now available only with 8-cylinder engines. Their fuel economy thus ranges somewhere between poor and disastrous and they necessarily produce enormous quantities of carbon dioxide—a gas that is firmly established as a cause of global warming. To make matters worse, legal loopholes in the huge U.S. market have allowed designs that belch out disproportionately high levels of smog-producing pollutants.2 Such extrava-gance might be excused if it came about in response to some urgent need for rough-terrain capability, but this is not the case: 87 to 90 percent of four-wheel-drive owners never take their vehicle off-road.3 Thirty years after the Club of Rome report, the SUV craze is a phenomenon that makes one wonder whether people in the industrialized West are interested in reducing their impact on the world environment. 1



 
Figure 1
    Figure 1. "Suzuki Likes Nature."

    Photo courtesy of the author.
 

. . .

There are about 19956 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.