You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Enviromental History online. About 180 words from this article are provided below; about 404 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to Environmental History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Environmental History, you can:
•  get subscription information here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Environmental History (8.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• get subscription information here to receive print and electronic issues.
• 
Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | Environmental History, 11.3 | The History Cooperative
11.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
July, 2006
Previous
Next
Environmental History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

Book Review


The Orphan Tsunami of 1700: Japanese Clues to a Parent Earthquake in North America. Edited by Brian F. Atwater, et al. Reston, Va., and Seattle: United States Geological Survey in association with University of Washington Press, 2005. vii + 133 pp. Illustrations, maps, tables, figures, references, index. Paper $24.95.

This is an unusual and fascinating book, a truly collaborative and interdisciplinary account of the tsunami that struck Japan on January 27-28, 1700, and the process by which scientists and historians linked the tsunami to an earthquake in Cascadia, the region west of the Cascades from southern British Columbia to northern California. Its central argument—that an earthquake with an approximate magnitude 9.0 occurred in the region in 1700—has made headlines and garnered the book's first author, Brian Atwater, a spot on Time Magazine's "100 most influential people of 2005." For most of the twentieth century, few believed that Cascadia could produce earthquakes of that magnitude: Atwater and his coauthors present evidence to the contrary, and their findings have had major implications for disaster planning in the region. . . .

There are about 404 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.