You have not been recognized as a subscriber to Enviromental History online. About 232 words from this article are provided below; about 446 words remain.
 
If you are a individual subscriber to Environmental History, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a subscriber to the Environmental History, you can:
•  get subscription information here.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of Environmental History (8.1-present).

Instititutions can:
• get subscription information here to receive print and electronic issues.
• 
Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | Environmental History, 10.2 | The History Cooperative
10.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
April, 2005
Previous
Next
Environmental History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

Book Review


Three Mile Island: A Nuclear Crisis in Historical Perspectivee. By Samuel J. Walker. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004. xi + 303 pp. Illustrations, bibliography, index. $24.95.

I first read a detailed account of the accident at the number 2 unit of the Three Mile Island nuclear power station (TMI-2) while a student at the Naval Nuclear Power School in Orlando, Florida, in 1984, where the case study was used to train future reactor operators. It was a chilling object lesson in how trained, experienced, and properly credentialed experts could misunderstand the technology they were operating and thus turn a minor incident into a near-catastrophe. In Walker's new account, the technical detail is reduced, but the lesson is no less chilling. 1
      Walker begins his narrative with The China Syndrome, a 1979 movie that was released two weeks before the accident and that explained to millions of Americans the "worst case scenario" for nuclear engineers: a core meltdown. Then he briefly reviews the history of the industry, including the close alliance of government and industry that promoted it, the rapid growth of electrical consumption through the 1960s and into the early 1970s that seemed to make commercial nuclear power inevitable, the growth of the anti-nuclear movement, and finally the collapse of the "nuclear market" in 1975, undermined financially by suddenly slowing consumption and increasing interest rates. . . .

There are about 446 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.