| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.1

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to the AHR online. About 250 words from this article are provided below; about 588 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the American Historical Association, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time. AHA members can go to the AHA individual membership section to locate their member numbers.
If you are not a member of the American Historical Association, you can:: • Join the AHA and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the American Historical Review.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the American Historical Review (104.3-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the American Historical Review.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The American Historical Review, 112.1 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Europe: Early Modern and Modern

Patricia Phillippy. Painting Women: Cosmetics, Canvases, and Early Modern Culture. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2006. Pp. xii, 258. $52.00.
This erudite, imaginative book examines the remarkable homogeneity of denunciations of women's use of cosmetics in early modern culture, from the Reformation through the late seventeenth century, in Catholic and Protestant cultures, in popular polemics and learned treatises, across England and Europe. As Patricia Phillippy shows, anti-cosmetics discourse and a thriving "cosmetic culture" coexisted and, together, shaped the conceptual and material world of possibility within which women artists had to operate. Phillippy seeks "to demonstrate how the dynamics of the cosmetic debate illuminate women artists' self-representations and, beyond this, to align these visual works with texts by women writers that engage the cosmetic debate in similar ways and deploy similar strategies for authorial self-fashioning" (pp. 17–18).	1
As Phillippy shows, there were material connections between painting faces and painting canvasses, as well as discursive and conceptual ones. Ceruse, or white lead, was the key ingredient in face paint and in the white pigments painters used; canvases and faces were rendered blank slates with this same (corrosive) ingredient. Furthermore, "colors for both arts of painting were sold at apothecaries' shops" (p. 31). Whereas women's creativity was sometimes denigrated through association with the deceptive, vain, and ephemeral practice of cosmetics, women might also achieve self-determination and sensual pleasure through their use of cosmetics. Nor was this the limit of their creativity.	. . .

There are about 588 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.